Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 20, having an 83.8 score against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than ZTE Axon 20, but it is a bit thinner and lighter anyway. The ZTE Axon 20 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display. Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
ZTE Axon 20 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures, a lot higher video resolution and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
ZTE Axon 20 features a little longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4220mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.