Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with an 83.8 score against 78.1. Galaxy A50 is an extremely older device than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a display that's very similar to Galaxy A50's screen, because although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little worse number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A50 features a superior memory to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a back camera with a way better resolution, a much higher video definition and a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.