Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2023-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Coffee Black and Snow White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SM7450-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 644 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than the HTC U23 Pro's score of 77.8. Galaxy A50s's construction is lighter and thinner than the HTC U23 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and HTC U23 Pro has Android 13 version.
Galaxy A50s has a bit better looking screen than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit more storage to store more games and applications than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much faster CPU than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. HTC U23 Pro has a little longer battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A50s shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.