Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, having an 86.6 score against 81. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s design is newer and just a bit thinner than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it is just a bit heavier.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50s features better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.