Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 score. Samsung Galaxy A50s is an noticeably older device than the Motorola Edge (2024), but Samsung managed to build it a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14.
Motorola Edge (2024) has a sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lot tinier sensor offering a lot lower image quality, a camera in the back with a worse resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit more storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.