Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a global score of 86.6 against 78.5. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. The Galaxy A50s is a just a little lighter phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but both of them are equally thin.
Galaxy A50s counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A50s features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a higher resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.