Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having an 86.6 score against 86.3. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A50s construction is just a little thinner and lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A50s features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a more megapixels back camera, a much larger camera aperture and a much larger sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.