Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than Moto G 5G, having an 86.6 score against 81.5. The Galaxy A50s design is extremely lighter and thinner than the Moto G 5G, although it was released just 14 months before. These devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A50s features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A50s has a slightly better camera than Moto G 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back camera.
The Moto G 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.