Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a global score of 86.6 against 76.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11. Although Galaxy A50s and the Motorola Moto G Power were released only 6 months apart, Galaxy A50s is extremely thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite greater display pixel density.
Galaxy A50s has a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G Power, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Power counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.