Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's score of 86.2. The Galaxy A50s is an way older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11.
The Moto G200 5G and Galaxy A50s both count with similar screens, because although the Moto G200 5G has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. Galaxy A50s has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Moto G200 5G has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Moto G200 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G200 5G also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a much better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.