Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, having a general score of 86.6 against 77.8. The Galaxy A50s design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. Galaxy A50s has a little bit better performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50s features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot better video definition. The Galaxy A50s features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G51 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.