Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the Moto G8 Power, having an 86.6 score against 76. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Moto G8 Power, even when they were only released 6 months apart.
Galaxy A50s has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little more vivid display than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a just a little better display pixel density and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G8 Power features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.