Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, with a score of 86.6 against 76.7. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should provide you all the same operating system features. Galaxy A50s's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Play, although it was released just 10 months before.
Galaxy A50s has a little faster processor than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A50s has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video and a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G9 Play features better battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.