Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto G9 Power's 78.6 global score. Galaxy A50s's design is lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto G9 Power, although it was released a bit more over a year before. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
The Galaxy A50s features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A50s counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a much greater screen density.
Moto G9 Power has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Galaxy A50s one, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A50s shoots slightly better videos and photos than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Moto G9 Power has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.