Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting an 86.6 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A50s body is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and a bit heavier than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels density.
Galaxy A50s has just a bit better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Galaxy A50s captures much better photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A50s features a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.