Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Galaxy A50s's construction is newer, but incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition and Samsung Galaxy A50s have incredibly similar processors, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels density. The Galaxy A50s shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F2 camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A50s also has a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.