Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having an 86.6 score against 77.4. Galaxy A50s is a extremely newer device than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it is somewhat heavier and much thicker. Galaxy A50s features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a very superior camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way more megapixels back camera.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50s counts with superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.