Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with an 86.6 score against 76.3. Galaxy A50s is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little greater screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A50s takes much better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
The Moto Z3 Play has just a bit more storage for apps and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A50s has improved battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.