Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a score of 86.6 against 79.8. The Galaxy A50s construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper, although they were released with only a few months difference. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A50s has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a quite higher screen density. The Motorola One Hyper features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Hyper's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in Galaxy A50s. Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, a camera with much less megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.