Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 403 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A50s has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images, a more mega pixels back facing camera and a much higher video definition.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.