Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the Sony Xperia XZs, getting an 86.6 score against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A50s's body is extremely newer and just a little thinner than the Sony Xperia XZs's, but it is a little heavier. The Xperia XZs and Galaxy A50s feature very similar displays, because although the Xperia XZs has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A50s has a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. Xperia XZs captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, although it has a worse video quality, a camera in the back with a lot worse 19 mega pixels resolution and a smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a worse image quality, they both have the same camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A50s features a superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 38 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.