Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, getting an 86.6 score against 83. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50s is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this review use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give identical operating system features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's processing unit is just as good as the Galaxy A50s one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T and Samsung Galaxy A50s both have quite similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a just a bit lower pixel amount per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T both have extremely similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same resolution camera in the back, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same video quality.
Galaxy A50s counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.