Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is a bit better than iPhone 11's 83.3 general score. Galaxy A51 5G counts with Android 11 OS, while iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x OS. Although Galaxy A51 5G and the iPhone 11 were released only a couple months apart, the Galaxy A51 5G body is just a bit thicker but also a little bit lighter.
The Apple iPhone 11 has a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 11 has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a way lower 828 x 1792px resolution and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone 11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3110mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.