Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is just a bit better than iPhone X, with a score of 90.8 against 88.1. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is noticeably newer, but a little bit heavier and thicker than iPhone X. The iPhone X counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels quantity in each screen inch and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.