Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the iPhone XR, getting a general score of 90.8 against 82. The Galaxy A51 5G is a newer and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the iPhone XR, although it is just a little bit thicker. IPhone XR features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792px, a little worse display pixel density and a quite smaller display.
The Apple iPhone XR features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Galaxy A51 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.