Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Apple iPhone XS's 84.2 overall score. The Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than Apple iPhone XS, although it's just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The iPhone XS has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the display and a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. IPhone XS has a better CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images in low-light situations and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.