Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a general score of 90.8 against 82.9. Even though Galaxy A51 5G and the Google Pixel 4 XL were released with only 6 months difference, the Galaxy A51 5G construction is a little lighter but also just a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 4 XL.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.