Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism cube black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is extremely newer than the HTC U Ultra, it is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier. HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way better resolution camera.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.