Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than HTC U11, having a global score of 90.8 against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is incredibly newer, but just a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the HTC U11. The HTC U11 features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The HTC U11 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than HTC U11, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.