Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG K52's score of 76. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10, giving a couple additional features. Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the LG K52, we must highlight that it's also a just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier device.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a brighter display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and much more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than LG K52, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The LG K52's processing unit is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's CPU, and although the LG K52 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior battery performance than LG K52, because it has a 13% greater battery size. Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.