Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is better than LG V10, having a 90.8 score against 78.6. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing the user some nice extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy A51 5G is a just a bit lighter cellphone than the LG V10, but they are equally thin.
Galaxy A51 5G has a greater processing power than LG V10, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V10 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG V10, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in low-light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than LG V10, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.