Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is just a bit better than the Galaxy A51 5G, with a score of 91.2 against 90.8. These devices include Android operating system, but LG Wing has 10 version and Galaxy A51 5G has Android 11 version. Although it's the best in this review, the LG Wing is a much thicker and noticeably heavier device than Galaxy A51 5G.
The LG Wing has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG Wing and Galaxy A51 5G have incredibly similar screens, because although the LG Wing has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Wing counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Wing also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs, better 60 fps video frame rate and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
The LG Wing has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A51 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A51 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A51 5G, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.