Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a bit better than Motorola Edge (2022), having a global score of 90.8 against 84.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is incredibly older, a little heavier and a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge (2022).
Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge (2022) and Galaxy A51 5G have very similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a little bit lower count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge (2022) and Galaxy A51 5G feature incredibly similar cameras, and although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a bigger diafragm aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a more MP back-facing camera, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.