Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is better than Moto G 5G, having a 90.8 score against 81.5. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10. Although the Galaxy A51 5G and Moto G 5G were released only 7 months apart, the Galaxy A51 5G is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a little greater pixels number per screen inch.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rates. Galaxy A51 5G has more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 64 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Moto G 5G has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.