Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto G60s's score of 79.9. The Galaxy A51 5G design is lighter and thinner than the Moto G60s. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give very similar OS features. The Galaxy A51 5G has a slightly better display than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit faster processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto G60s features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A51 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G60s, although it has a lower video definition, a way lower resolution back facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.