Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Moto G8 Power, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 76. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, providing the user some additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy A51 5G design is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G8 Power, even when they were released with only 0 months difference.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A51 5G has a bit sharper screen than Moto G8 Power, because it has a quite greater display pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G8 Power, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G8 Power has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.