Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's general score of 76.4. The Galaxy A51 5G design is extremely newer than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater screen pixels density. Galaxy A51 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 5G counts with greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.