Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism cube black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola Moto Z3's general score of 77.6. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Galaxy A51 5G is newer than the Motorola Moto Z3, it is incredibly thicker and heavier.
Moto Z3 features a little better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto Z3 and Galaxy A51 5G both count with incredibly similar displays, although the Moto Z3 has a just a little worse pixel amount in each inch of display, a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a F2 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a much more megapixels back facing camera and a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a little more money than Motorola Moto Z3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.