Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, with a overall score of 90.8 against 81.6. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola One 5G Ace were only released 9 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have a camera with a 48 mega pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One 5G Ace has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A51 5G is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.