Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola One Action, with a 90.8 score against 78.5. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G and the Motorola One Action were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy A51 5G's design is a bit thinner but also a little heavier than the Motorola One Action. The Motorola One Action has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a bit better pixels number in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola One Action has as much memory for games and applications as the Galaxy A51 5G, they have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and the same 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has superior battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a bit more than the Motorola One Action, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.