Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola One Hyper were released only 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS.
Galaxy A51 5G has just a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a just a bit better display pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution, a worse video definition and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations. Motorola One Hyper's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the Galaxy A51 5G one, both have the same internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.