Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is newer than Nokia 9 PureView's, although it is just a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
Nokia 9 PureView features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G features better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3320mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.