Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 score. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a a little thinner and a little lighter phone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when both of them were released with only a few months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a better pixel density. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video definition and a back-facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments, a much bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.