Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Galaxy A51 5G's design is a bit lighter than Galaxy A25 5G, although it is a little bit thicker and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a quite worse pixels number per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, they both have a display with the same size. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting images in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.