Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, getting a general score of 90.8 against 90.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is a little lighter but just a little bit thicker.
Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 and Galaxy A51 5G feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a quite worse pixels number in each display inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with faster 30 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.