Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
U.S. CellularSM-N910R4
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 340.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy Note 4's 81.6 score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version while Galaxy Note 4 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is incredibly newer than the Galaxy Note 4's, although it is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy Note 4 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.