Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 global score. Galaxy A51 5G's body is noticeably newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's CPU is very similar to the processor in Galaxy A51 5G, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater display density. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos.
Galaxy A51 5G features a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.