Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's global score of 77.7. The Galaxy A51 5G design is notably newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note3. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has more cpu cores (although they are slower) and a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite larger display.
Galaxy A51 5G has much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a way bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.