Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.60 ounces | -- |
| Prism cube black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is slightly better than Galaxy S25, having a 90.8 score against 82.6. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light environments, a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.