Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than Galaxy S5 Sport, having a global score of 90.8 against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a bigger aperture for better captures in low light environments and a much larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy A51 5G features much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G is a bit more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.